New Eddie ‘Shocked’ At Watson Sewage Tunnel View


This is a release from the New Edinburgh Community Alliance:

New Edinburgh residents were shocked to hear that Mayor Jim Watson refused to meaningfully address the health and safety concerns of the community ahead of the commencement of a signature infrastructure project.
During a meeting with a delegation of New Edinburgh community representatives on Feb. 6, the mayor insisted work on the massive East-West Combined Sewage Storage Tunnel (CSST) centred in Stanley Park would proceed as planned. Since first learning of the CSST project in October 2016, the community has continued to demand that a meaningful assessment be done of the health, safety and welfare implications of three years of blasting, heavy trucks and diesel fumes within a densely populated residential community, without success. While the city believes that it is respecting baseline health and safety regulations, the community remains unconvinced of the city’s grasp on the mitigation of mounting unanswered noise, safety and environmental concerns attributed to the construction and extraction activities associated with the four large shafts in close proximity to many homes.
As local resident David Slinn points out, “Just to be clear, this is not about NIMBYism. These sorts of projects shouldn’t be in any residential neighbourhood, but the mayor refuses to seriously acknowledge the clear advantages presented to all parties as a result of a change in direction of the East-West CSST tunnelling.”
At a meeting held in New Edinburgh on Feb. 4, members of the community expressed their numerous concerns with the CSST project and the city’s lack of transparency and accountability. Although residents were aware that the new sewage tunnel would involve some digging in the neighbourhood, they felt blindsided by the fact that the entire project was to be launched from the park in New Edinburgh. “Since learning of this project, the community has been on a steep learning curve and has had to deal with an Ottawa City CSST Project Team that has been remarkably slow or unable to respond to clear questions regarding health, safety and technical aspects of the project,” comments Gosse Bruinsma, whose designated heritage property lies within a stone’s throw of the main extraction site.
Marta Klepaczek, who lives by Stanley Park and has young children, adds: “This is not about opposing a project aimed at protecting the health of the river. We support that objective. We are not talking about minor disruption and inconvenience, but serious and foreseeable harm caused by living at ground zero, next to blasting and tunnelling that is occurring within a couple of metres from people’s living rooms in some cases. What we will be exposed to can’t fully be mitigated and can be associated with cumulative and prolonged health impacts, especially in our vulnerable population.”
These views were echoed by Sonny Dhanani, paediatrician and father of six-year-old Yasmin. “The human health and welfare impacts of this proposal have not been thought through.” The planned 20,000 plus truckloads of drilling muck and disturbance of contaminated soil in Stanley Park continues to raise alarm bells within the community, as does the allowance for noise levels up to 130 decibels – a level that can cause serious harm in a very short amount of time. Nor does there seem to have been any account taken of the fact that the community is home to several schools and at least three retirement residences, which are all regular users of Stanley Park.
The many residents who came out to support the delegation at city hall expressed their dismay that the mayor has seemingly become insensitive to voters’ concerns. Residents continue to write to local politicians and have circulated a petition that has attracted more than 600 signatures. The petition argues the community’s health, safety and heritage values are under threat.
During the meeting with the mayor, the community was invited to present its facts and analysis to City of Ottawa management in regards to alternatives to the extraction and trucking of tunnelling materials from Stanley Park. Likewise, the city announced the launch of a CSST New Edinburgh Community Engagement Strategy to better appraise residents of the imminent fallout and impacts of the looming construction about to occur. While the community acknowledges this as a step in the right direction, there remains a large credibility gap to overcome. In the city and contractor’s own documents and schedules, the community believes the incremental costs of switching the direction of tunnelling in the East-West tunnel can be offset by schedule gains realized with this switch.
New Edinburgh, which is home to Rideau Hall, is a Heritage Conservation District. Residents also note that the heritage impacts of the project have not been addressed. If the project were to go ahead, New Edinburgh will not be in any state to help celebrate Canada’s 150th birthday despite having an important role in its history.



Back to The Bulldog’s home page, click here.

To comment on this post, use the reply box at the bottom of this page.



Bulldog Fetch brings you the best in politics, movies, entertainment, TV, travel, viral, style and news features. You can’t stay current without Bulldog Fetch. To read it, click here.



To get the finest in Canadian news and opinion, click here for Bulldog Canadian. Your one stop for Canadian politics.



For Ottawa’s complete summary of local news as it happens, Full Local is the place to go. If you need up-to-the-minute Ottawa news from Ottawa’s major sources now, click here.


Advertise In The Bulldog, Click Here

Report a typo to

4 thoughts on “New Eddie ‘Shocked’ At Watson Sewage Tunnel View

  1. I’m very surprised to see that they only have garnered 600 signatures on their petition.

    They should have been able to collect more on a weekend standing outside the Beechwood Metro with a clipboard. It also tells me that they haven’t been able to get much support from other communities.

    You don’t have to live in New Edinburgh to be affected by this and, if it works there, expect this high-handed approach and disregard for both residents and the heritage nature of a community to happen in your backyard.

  2. A note to citizens – in a presentation to government your side needs facts backed by experts; organization backed by leadership; strength backed by numbers and the resolve to spend money and time.

    Any government has already made all its decisions long before they have any meetings with the public on any issue, project and expenditure. Public consultation is merely an after-the-fact process designed to make it look like everything is transparent and that they listen.

    The public then gets to agree, disagree or not give a damn.

    If the disagreeing side thinks that they are right, then they must be prepared to do battle. Logic, justice and even facts are not as powerful as numbers and money.

  3. How did the NE Community Alliance only learn about this in October? Hasn’t there been discussions about this for several years?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *