Reader Thinks Pot Policy Is That Of Convenience


Frequent Bulldog contributor Ron Benn discovers the origin of public policy:

People have to look beyond the rhetoric and social positioning on this issue, and for that matter pretty much every policy initiative.

Policy initiatives in political parties do not come up from the grassroots. They never have and they never will. That is just an illusionist’s trick to distract you from how policy really gets to the front of the line. Policy makes it to the top of the legislative list when it is fully supported by the people of influence in the party. It doesn’t matter whether it is the Liberals, the Conservatives, the NDP or the Greens. That is how it happens.

With that as context, legalizing marijuana is not about how someone who already has a prescription for marijuana gets a wider choice of supply channels. This is about how a couple of generations, notably the people born in the ’50s, ’60s and ’70s, can get their hands on some recreational pot without having to figure out how to find a dealer who happens to be young enough to be their child or grandchild. These are the people who want to smoke a few joints (or whatever the current terminology is) without fear of being arrested or robbed. These are the people who will ensure that the policy meets their needs. If the policy happens to help those with medical issues that are eased by using marijuana, that is just window dressing – but very important window dressing, because that is what the power brokers are hiding behind.

Respectfully yours,

Ron Benn
Member emeritus
Cynics Club



Back to The Bulldog’s home page, click here.

To comment on this post, use the reply box at the bottom of this page.

Bulldog Fetch brings you the best in politics, movies, entertainment, TV, travel, viral, style and news features. You can’t stay current without Bulldog Fetch. To read it, click here.



To get the finest in Canadian news and opinion, click here for Bulldog Canadian. Your one stop for Canadian politics.



For Ottawa’s complete summary of local news as it happens, Full Local is the place to go. If you need up-to-the-minute Ottawa news from Ottawa’s major sources now, click here.


weather icon

For The Bulldog’s detailed Ottawa 10-Day Forecast and Weather Alerts, click here.

Report a typo to

4 thoughts on “Reader Thinks Pot Policy Is That Of Convenience

    1. The answer to that question is the same: the people who are in a position to influence the politicians, and those people are not part of the grass roots.

  1. ahh Ron,
    What a person does to their own body is none of my business.

    Red meat eaters may cost money in extra health care for those clogged arteries.
    Vegans may cost money in extra health care because of vitamin and mineral deficiencies .
    Drinkers may cost money in extra health care because the liver blows up.

    Prohibition has always worked in the past – not.

    Ban everything or ban nothing. Blue Laws suck.

    1. Chaz, I neither endorsed nor rejected the proposed legalization of marijuana. I was merely pointing out that the policy, as recently proposed, was designed to meet the needs of those who are in a position to influence policy, rather than to meet the needs of the general public.

      As it relates to the legalization of marijuana, the needs of those who are positions of influence include, among other things: ease of access; attracting more voters to the governing party than they lose; and creating additional revenue sources to fund projects and programs that have nothing to do with cannabis consumption, which again are directed at attracting more votes.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *