Even Clewes says so. That shows disrespect to the people of Ottawa who for the most part are outraged about a modern addition stuck to the iconic railroad hotel. Yet Clewes doggedly sticks to his artistic conception which is deeply in question.
Ottawa has seen these consultations many times before. The public attends them in goodwill hoping their opinions might stick, then they’re largely ignored by the city and the builder because the big hitters want what they want and that’s it.
Ottawans don’t like the addition and they’re right. The Chateau is one of the symbols of this city, the parliamentary district and Canada.
Heritage Ottawa said it well:
“The current design of the proposed addition is incongruous with the heritage character of the Chateau Laurier and its environs. Bluntly stated, the proposed addition resembles a contemporary condominium.”
That’s correct. If this addition goes forward, will Ottawans see a condo stuck to the Parliament Buildings’ library? A condo in front of the Supreme Court? A condo hooked on to the Canadian Museum of History? Perhaps the architect will tell us they are symbols of man’s inhumanity toward his fellow man. And architecturally, he’d be right.
These are symbols of Canada. Perhaps Clewes would stick a condo on the back of the Acropolis as a statement of today and modernity. Such is the myopic attitude of the artist.
The owners of the Chateau should know they possess a national icon, not a Comfort Inn.
The Chateau should be treated with the respect it deserves as an integral part of Canada’s capital.
Back to The Bulldog’s home page, click here.
To comment on this post, use the reply box at the bottom of this page.
To get the finest in Canadian news and opinion, click here for Bulldog Canadian. Your one stop for Canadian politics.
For Ottawa’s complete summary of local news as it happens, Full Local is the place to go. If you need up-to-the-minute Ottawa news from Ottawa’s major sources now, click here.
For The Bulldog’s detailed Ottawa 10-Day Forecast and Weather Alerts, click here.