So Why Have Double-Decker Buses? Whopper Watch

double decker

A double-decker bus from another land. Why are we trying these out?


After last week’s nasty snow storm that ground the Ottawa transportation system to a crawl, we discovered something about Ottawa’s reasonably new double-decker buses.

They don’t work as well as the giant articulated models.

The articulated buses hold more people than regular buses and they are easier to unload and load than double-deckers. No kidding. That’s the view of OC Transpo head honcho John Manconi.

At first blush, you wonder how you get people with disabilities, the elderly and mothers with carriages up on the second floor. Of course, you don’t. And walking down an aisle in a lurching regular bus can be a challenge. How about getting to the second floor on the double-deckers?

So why are we trying out double-deckers if they are less effective than we already have?


To comment on this post, use the reply box at the bottom of this page.


bottTo return to Bulldog Ottawa’s home page, click here.


bcanTo read Bulldog Canadian on national affairs, the federal government and the public service, click here.


btweetFollow Ken Gray on Twitter to get the daily Bulldog Ottawa news feed …


bface… or friend Ken Gray on Facebook for the news feed.


brssSubscribe to Bulldog Ottawa through your RSS feed or click on the RSS icon to the left. Also subscribe by email using the easy subscription form on this page.


Email Ken Gray at kengray@bulldogcanadian.com with your opinions. Gray welcomes these emails for possible publication on Bulldog Ottawa.

This entry was posted in Bulldog Ottawa and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to So Why Have Double-Decker Buses? Whopper Watch

  1. Ken Gray says:

    @David

    Both points you make are excellent.

    cheers and thx for the comment

    kgray

  2. David says:

    They’re used because they have more capacity per metre of length. If their use is restricted to routes where people tend to get on, stay on for a long time and get off without more people getting on (i.e. low turnover), then they can be useful. Those routes of course are express routes.

    The very fact we’re using double deckers at all shows how desperate the transit system has become to squeeze out every extra bit of capacity it can. Put simply, if we had started making a serious go at converting to rail a decade ago rather than wasting time and effort on coming up with a pointless replacement for the O-Train, we likely would never have acquired double deckers at all.

Comments are closed.