Tunnel Delays Light-Rail Expansion

rick.chiarelli.ad


Calgary’s ridiculous fast and tunnel-less C-Train. No wonder it is so successful.


Here’s what happens when you blow your fiscal brains out building a $2.1-billion light-rail line.

Everybody wants the line to come to their community. But of course the city doesn’t have the money.

About $700 million of that is being spent on a tunnel. That’s roughly how much the trashed Chiarelli plan would have cost to take light rail from the University of Ottawa to Barrhaven. Accordingly, $1.4-billion would be left over. And oh yes … the line would have been running a number of years ago.

Kanata South Councillor Allan Hubley wants light rail to come to Kanata before Orleans.

Cumberland Councillor Stephen Blais wants light rail to come to Orleans before Kanata.

Blais says the east end are heavy transit-users which is true. Hubley doesn’t want to build a line for Rockland commuters to get into the city.

Blais has the better argument because Hubley’s is almost non-existent.

But here’s the real problem. We didn’t follow Calgary’s example.

Calgary didn’t tunnel downtown but made its light-rail lines stretch over long distances. They didn’t immediately build a downtown tunnel. They didn’t do something stupid such as causing the majority of transit riders to transfer from bus to train at Tunney’s Pasture and Blair Road … the ends of this ridiculously short line.

Calgary’s plan was much like the cancelled Chiarelli plan. Had the nixed plan gone forward, the lines to Kanata and Orleans would be well into construction. Both Blais and Hubley would be happy.

So this ridiculous and dedicated rail line (light rail is meant to be more flexible … if we’re going dedicated line, we could have gone with higher-capacity vehicles) is slowing down the extension of rail transit to high-population areas of the city.

Ottawa built a Cadillac when Mayor Jim Watson’s usual Chevy would have sufficed.

Calgary, without a tunnel, went on to build one of the most successful light-rail systems in North America. Edmonton and Buffalo went with tunnels with poor results.

One politician described the Edmonton system as not a complete disaster.

In Ottawa, we should be so lucky.


bf.ad.final

Bulldog Fetch has the most popular stories in the world. Entertainment, homes, world news, gossip, horoscopes … To read it, click here.

Back to The Bulldog’s home page, click here.

To comment on this post, use the reply box at the bottom of this page.

bulldogcanadian

To get the best in Canadian news and opinion, click here for Bulldog Canadian.












2 thoughts on “Tunnel Delays Light-Rail Expansion

  1. These idiots have spent a fortune on a tunnel that was not necessary. They now do not have any money to get the people.

    Thanks to the City of Ottawa’s ineptness once again showing itself!

    0

  2. Actually, the expanded east-west lines would have already been operating. The line to Riverside South/Barrhaven Centre in 2009. By the time fed-provincial funds were available in 2009, the next stage (east-west) Environmental Assessment would have been completed and we would have been “shovel-ready” for immediate $. So the Carling line would have been operating by now as well. And all at little more than the current stub. Thank you Mayors O’Brien and Watson. Sigh!

    0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *