Watson More Than Doubles Municipal Accumulated Debt



The accumulated debt of the City of Ottawa has more than doubled over the Jim Watson years at Ottawa City Hall.

The debt as of Dec. 31, 2010 was $835 million, according to Isabelle Jasmin, Deputy City Treasurer, Corporate Finance whose figures were relayed to The Bulldog through the city’s media relations department by email.

However by Dec. 31, 2016, the accumulated debt at the City of Ottawa had skyrocketed to $1.71 billion or more than twice the amount than when the Watson years began.

In other words, the Watson administration has more than doubled in six years the debt that took the entire history of the City of Ottawa to accumulate.

Watson has painted himself as the boring number-cruncher who strives to keep Ottawa’s property-tax increases to two per cent. And he has done this while drastically raising some municipal utility bills and fees.

But the real story behind Watson’s fiscal affairs is his ability to create debt and deficits. While holding property-tax increases to two per cent, last year he created the largest operating deficit in the history of Ottawa.

But in the Watson realm, image is everything so he touts his two-per-cent property-tax increases as a sign he is a fiscal conservative. That is anything but the truth.

What Watson has been doing is wildly creating debt during his mayoral years that will be left for the next mayor and future generations of Ottawans to pay off. He is mortgaging the city finances to build great monuments during his years and leaving the city coffers bereft of cash following his term of office … all the time saying he is a fiscal conservative.

This is not the first time this has happened. When Watson was the mayor of the former city of Ottawa, amalgamation was made much more difficult because communities such as Nepean (which was debt-free) were reluctant to assume the Watson debt.

Eventually amalgamation came about through legislation from the Ontario government of former premier Mike Harris. Queen’s Park went over the heads of municipal leaders to impose amalgamation.

But now Watson is running up a spectacular debt with no amalgamation in the offing to cover his spending.

Watson decided not to run for mayor in the first amalgamated election leaving former regional chairman and Ottawa mayor Bob Chiarelli to clean up Watson’s mess.

That in part is spurring speculation that Watson will not run for re-election in 2018 and stoked rumours that he is shopping his services to obtain a prestigious appointment.

That said, Watson has announced officially he is running in 2018 but that doesn’t bind him to hit the hustings next year.

A number of city hall insiders say that the accumulated debt, once Ottawans discover its magnitude, will eventually drive Watson from municipal government. These same insiders say Watson fears that a capable electoral opponent could use the accumulated debt figures to force him from office.

The figures are above. They are not good. They are not good at all.


Photo above: Mayor Jim Watson is not a sure thing to run for re-election in 2018.

Back to The Bulldog’s home page, click here.

To comment on this post, use the reply box at the bottom of this page.




Best Bites: Bulldog Food

The Best: The Top Stories In The World

Bulldog Homes: Your Place Done Right

Great Pix: Bulldog Photography

Bloomberg Live-Streaming Video News

Bulldog Technology

Bulldog Celebrities

Bulldog Travel

Bulldog Sports

Bulldog Hockey

Bulldog Sens

Your Comments: The Sound And The Fury

Donald Trump’s Controversial Twitter Feed

Full Local: All Your Ottawa News


CBC Radio One, 1310 News, CFRA, TSN 1200

Movie Reviews And News

Music Reviews And News

Ottawa Gas Prices

#ottnews: Ottawa’s Breaking News

RSS Comment Feed For Bulldog Ottawa

RSS News Feed for Bulldog Ottawa

TV Reviews And News

What’s On: Ottawa Events

For your 10-day Ottawa and world weather forecasts, click here.

Return to The Bulldog (Ottawa), Bulldog Canadian or Bulldog Politics.


4 thoughts on “Watson More Than Doubles Municipal Accumulated Debt

  1. Let’s not forget that he has 23 henchpeople helping him get to those levels. He needs at least 12 of them to vote with him to approve the spending plans that create the $875M addition.
    $1.71B is roughly $1,900 per child, woman and man currently living in Ottawa.

  2. Doubling in seven years was, once upon a time, a possible accounting expectation, although that was back when things were a tad different.
    Using the “Rule of 72” ( this is only a quick guesstimating method ) it would take 7 years of compound interest at 10% to double an investment.
    Do you remember those days?
    Well they ain’t been around for a long time. Economy went into the toilet back in 2008. The current economic model has not yet recovered from how it was and , in my opinion, it never can. I guess the city of Ottawa has just been doing its duty to bolster the economy with a spending spree. Much like too many Canadians carrying too much household debt – this will eventually come home to roost. Greece has led the way, maybe Ottawa will follow its lead?

  3. And what do we have in the way of “things” to show for the debt? A toy train to nowhere, a city which still dumps raw sewage into one of the most scenic rivers, pending a great big holding tank, a compost facility costing millions more than we get in value, almost daily shooting deaths, a garbage solution which solved nothing and left Ottawa years behind in actually solving the crisis of waste disposal, and on and on.
    At least the people who accumulate excessive personal debt have houses and cars which they may sometime pay off. Ottawa debt not so much.

  4. Was living in Gloucester when there was a double digit tax increase and only then were residents outraged. In that case, the current Mayor was around to reap the outrage!
    Seems Ottawa voters are so thrilled with the ‘only 2%’ increase that they forget it compounds yearly and yet services diminish.
    When it all hits the fan, I fear Watson will be long gone. His deeds however will never be forgotten — a Mayor with an asterisk beside his name.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *