‘When Will The Bulldog Be French?’


Bulldog reader Mark Kerr takes issue with The Bulldog’s stand of official bilingualism for civic Ottawa:

Just read Ken Gray’s article about his desire to make Ottawa officially bilingual and I strongly disagree.

If symbolism (two, not one, founding cultures …languages) is so important, why are people like him not asking why Quebec is not officially bilingual and why do they only push for Ottawa, not the national capital region ( Lots of federal public service, museums) to be officially bilingual? Why do people like him feel its OK for places like Gatineau to remain officially French while people like my girlfriend (federal public service and unilingual) have to work over there and take Quebec public transit that is French only?

Symbolism … its symbolic of a lack of common sense and fairness. Gray does not get it about Quebec and separatism. You can appease them all you want and they will never be happy until the country is controlled by Quebec and its language. It’s as naive as the left feeling if we stay out of the Middle East, extremists will leave us alone.

Separatists feel Canada should have been French in the first place and that the English took it away from them and they will never be reasonable.

Look how well Canada’s official bilingualism calmed them down. They just wanted more.

Two groups you cannot rationalize with: naive people and extremists.

People might take Gray a little more seriously if they include asking why places like Quebec and the Gatineau are not as concerned about symbolism.

You will never appease militant groups like separatists unless you make things more fair for them at our expense. It’s like modern day feminism. It’s not about true equality. It’s about more rights for one group versus equal rights.

Official languages commissior nominee Madeleine Meilleur will be all about more French.

I thought The Bulldog was about common sense.

Am I biased, yes. I am English, unilingual and was driven out of Quebec in the 1970s because of the anti-English separatists.

Not anti-French (kid is in 100 per cent French school) , but I am certainly anti-appeasing language zealots who have no interest in linguistic fairness.

It’s not just about money either. It will turn out like the federal PS and unfairly exclude many unilingual anglos in Ottawa.

An officially bilingual Ottawa will disadvantage anglos with employment; will open the door for language zealots and court cases. It will cost us more money.

Just keep Ottawa the way it is, just like Gatineau and Quebec, not officially bilingual.

When is The Bulldog going to become an officially bilingual? Why is it not also in French to recognize the minority French population in Ottawa? Hopefully everyone working there is bilingual.

After Ottawa becomes officially bilingual, this will put pressure to make it so only bilingual people run for council.

An important thing in life is fairness and it’s very symbolic that official bilingualism means more of only one of the two official language – French.

Mark Kerr,



Back to The Bulldog’s home page, click here.

To comment on this post, use the reply box at the bottom of this page.




Bulldog Technology

Bulldog Celebrities

Bulldog Travel

Bulldog Sports

Bulldog Hockey

Bulldog Sens

Your Comments: The Sound And The Fury

Donald Trump’s Controversial Twitter Feed

Full Local: All Your Ottawa News


CBC Radio One, 1310 News, CFRA, TSN 1200

Movie Reviews And News

Music Reviews And News

Ottawa Gas Prices

#ottnews: Ottawa’s Breaking News

RSS Comment Feed For Bulldog Ottawa

RSS News Feed for Bulldog Ottawa

TV Reviews And News

What’s On: Ottawa Events

For your 10-day Ottawa and world weather forecasts, click here.

Return to The Bulldog (Ottawa), Bulldog Canadian or Bulldog Politics.


4 thoughts on “‘When Will The Bulldog Be French?’

  1. When I was young, my mother used to make me wear my hair in braids or a ponytail to keep it out of my face at school and other places.

    None of the other kids in my class had to do this and I felt quite miss-used. When I asked why, her response was that just because others don’t follow certain standards, that’s no reason for you not to.

    Could we maybe approach the bilingualism question from the perspective of whether it’s the right thing to do rather than pointing out what others aren’t doing? Sometimes, you just need to take the high road and perhaps, if you do, others will follow your example. It seems to me a nobler approach that sitting at both ends of a bridge saying I’m not going to do it because he’s not doing it.

    1. The Voter,
      You had a mother who taught you a valuable life lesson. I am glad you picked up on it and are carrying on in her teachings. Nothing wrong with your compass.

  2. Being gracious isn’t the same thing as being taken advantage of.

    Grace is an asset. People interacting without a scoreboard. Gracious people act graciously without regard of waiting for a tit-for-tat from the other side. Even kindness in return isn’t an expectation. Don’t worry about the other guy, be gracious for graciousness’ sake.

    And, Ken does not need to publish in French because he is not running a public service.

    Things do get better when grace is in the air. Grace can be exhibited even by an atheist like me.


  3. Being graceful and/or doing the right thing has financial consequences for anyone who is not bilingual, i.e. it limits their chance of equal opportunity employment. Again, the school system needs to be changed first and make English and French mandatory.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *