Here’s A New Take On Return-To-Office

Now here’s an angle that hasn’t been discussed in the debate over work-from-home and return-to-office.

This is in response to Dan Stankovic’s Bulldog post on the city’s reasoning behind its return-to-work policy.


To read Stankovic’s post, click here.

The post below is from Bluesky:

 

work.from .home .bluesky

 

>



For You:

Return To Office All About Politics: STANKOVIC

Give Us The Facts On Speed Cameras: BENN

Speed Cameras Are A Tax Grab: PATTON

Get More Happy With Happy Town News

Riders Condemn New Ways To Bus

 

Bookmark The Bulldog, click here




4 Responses

  1. Andrew says:

    As a Manager I had to ensure work from home met all standards including leave. It is a fact work from home staff do not take “appointment leave”, family related leave, sick leave etc when office workers do. Union contracts do not have any accommodation for this inequitable difference. A office worker has to take a day off for sick children at home, not work from home. The leave accumulation by work from home is clear evidence of inequitable working conditions. For this reason the system needs large changes, and until that happens the fair way of solving this problem is having all work at the office. OC transpo will benefit from increased ridership as well.

  2. sisco farraro says:

    One thing that has been missing from all the articles and comments concerning return from home to the office full-time is how many people will be returning, or, if they are already working part-time in the office, how many will be returning to full-time duty? Is it hundreds of workers, thousands, tens of thousands? Without knowing the facts (the number of people and/or the number of hours) it is difficult to predict the impact on improved service from city hall, increased revenues for downtown restaurants that serve lunch, OC Transpo ridership, etc. At this point all we’ve heard from senior management is conjecture.

  3. Ron Benn says:

    Thank you, Andrew for pointing out some of the differences between ‘in office’ and ‘at home’ work scenarios. Managing staff equitably is always a challenge. Even more so when collective bargaining agreements are in place, as these invariably limit the range of alternatives.

    Other points to consider.

    Nearly all of the studies that people cite focus on the issue from an employee’s perspective. The benefits of reduced commute times leading to more family time. Lower child care costs. The employee’s sense of their own productivity.

    What about the studies that examined the employer’s perspective?

    How do managers evaluate individual productivity? If there are material differences, where an ‘in office’ employee out-performs an ‘at home’ employee, how much time and effort is put in by the manager trying to figure out whether it is due to an individual skill level or a work location issue?

    How much time do managers spend having to handle significant differences of opinion about that productivity?

    How much time do managers spend handling conflicts due to the perception of unequal and inequitable treatment of ‘in office’ and ‘at home’ staff? How does senior management handle ‘at home’ employees who are upset when passed over for a promotion to an ‘in office’ colleague?

    All of these challenges consume a manager’s time. Time that might otherwise be spent in different value-added areas of their job.

    These are real issues. Issues that need to be looked at in conjunction with employee job satisfaction. Like most situations in life, the answer lies somewhere in between the two extremes. Like most situations in life, the solution requires that both sides approach the situation with an open mind. And the shortage of open minds at the table is one of the biggest impediments to reaching a viable solution.

  4. Donna Mulvihill says:

    “OC Transpo will benefit from increased ridership” … OC Transpo has a hard enough time getting riders to and from their destinations as it is! One can only imagine the horrors should more riders take the plunge.
    Roads are already clogged enough.
    This manager might want to consider the effect hours long commuting has in his or her employees’ mental health and how WFH improves their well-being.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ken Gray: Editor --- Advertise: email: kengray20@gmail.com

Translate »