Peaceful Protests Foster Healthy Democracy: GRAY

The Bubble Bylaw is a no-brainer.

No. Definitely no.

Democracy is messy. Healthy democracy encourages debate. Part of that process includes protests which are often messy. Protests are fundamental to our democracy. So too town halls, debates and public participation foster a vibrant society.

The alternative is authoritarianism or extremism or even violence.

So limiting protests to 100 metres away from sensitive locations is just the thin edge of the wedge. Governments don’t like protests, though they should. Protests disrupt the finely honed plans of government. Protests are a small bit of chaos that can expose bad legislation or government’s effort to take the mess out of democracy by banning elements of freedom of expression.

So what are these sensitive locations where protests must be a football field away from these place? City hall? Parliament Hill? The Parliamentary Precinct? Ottawa?

And who decides which locations cannot experience a peaceful protest? City hall bureaucrats, many of whom try desperately to keep their mistakes or unpopular plans secret? The police? The mayor? City council?

City hall, which on occasion purports to back democracy more than one day every four years, has been found in the past and the present to withhold vital information, to lie and to break the law. This operation is going to tell us where citizens can protest? This civic government is bankrupt in the sense that rather than being open, caring and inclusive, it is closed, uncaring and exclusive.

The 100-metre rule can be used as another weapon against freedom of expression, as though there aren’t enough of those rules already and people in authority eager to use them.

The 100-metre barrier is a blanket rule. It doesn’t delineate between the Canadian Brotherhood of Football Fans Against The American Football Fair-Catch Rule or the Kanata Society of Grandmothers Against Baby Farts from the Proud Boys.

No matter your intentions, everyone is banned from that 100 metres. When will it become 200 metres? Three hundred metres? Or not allowed at all?

There are more than enough laws on the books to stop demonstrations that get out-of-hand. We have laws piled on top of laws. It takes good intelligence and smart people to measure the threat. The CBFFAAFFCR or the KSGABF are not much of a threat and you gear your protection accordingly. The Proud Boys? You might want a couple of extra police officers around.

And a $100,000 fine. The Fair-Catchers and the Baby Farters would be wiped out by such a fine. Where is the freedom of expression in that?

No. The idea giving government that practises noversight, lying, lying by omission and incompetence on a $6-billion scale the right to limit protests, is like giving a fire bug a pack of matches.

Governments don’t like protests. They can cost them votes. They can be embarrassing.

Furthermore blanket bans are for people who don’t think. Not much thinking in high places went on during the Freedom Convoy protest.

Governments don’t like protests so they consider giving themselves the power to limit them. Guess how that will turn out in the long run?

Democracy is precious and messy. Let’s keep it that way.

Freedom of expression means freedom of expression … not freedom of expression by peace-loving people outside of 100 metres of a politician’s office.

Protests are noisy, messy, inconvenient, passionate and democratic. And that’s why we love them so much. We should encourage protests rather than hinder them.

Protests are the sign of a healthy society, confident that it can thrive within the context of peaceful democracy.

Bulldog editor Ken Gray has been a journalist at five major Canadian newspapers over a career that has spanned more than four decades.

For You:

Is Bubble Bylaw A Cash Grab? THE VOTER

Menard Protests Bubble Bylaw Proposal

Follow The U.S. Election Live On The Bulldog

Bookmark The Bulldog, click here