City Takes Week To Release Critical Mishap





Why did it take seven days to learn of this critical infrastructure situation?

This is a release from the City of Ottawa:

Subject / Objet Bayswater Watermain Date: November 21 2024




The purpose of this memo is to advise Members of Council of a critical watermain break within  the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO) corridor near Fairmont and Young Street and the  subsequent response and mitigation measures that are in place.  

Background 

On Thursday, November 14, Infrastructure and Water Services staff responded to a critical  watermain break within the Highway 417 corridor near Fairmont Avenue and Young Street. The location of the break is within the construction limits of the MTO sound barrier project. The  Infrastructure and Water Services Department (IWSD) team successfully isolated the watermain break and implemented contingency plans to ensure the continuity of water services. The MTO  sound barrier project team is working with the IWSD response team to investigate the break site  to assist IWSD in developing our repair plan. The City’s water system remains safe although the  extent of the isolation has impacted overall resiliency of the system. 

Due to the proximity of Highway 417 and the complexities to access the site, IWSD has activated  its Departmental Command Centre on Tuesday, November 19 to coordinate communication,  mitigation, and response efforts related to the repair. On November 20, the City’s Office of  Emergency Management entered Monitoring Operations.  

We are working closely with the MTO to develop and implement a repair plan that protects the  Province’s critical transportation asset and restores our water system to normal operation. 



Mitigation Measures  

Out of an abundance of caution and to protect the water system resiliency, staff have  implemented a ‘no-dig zone’ around watermains that are critical to maintaining resiliency. These  critical watermains (dotted black line) are illustrated in Figure 1. Any proposed excavations which  present a risk to the critical watermains will undergo a risk assessment and may be prohibited or  in some situations may be permitted under strict operational constraints. The no-dig zone will be  reviewed and amended as additional mitigation measures are implemented. 

Staff are working closely with industry and City partners to communicate the no-dig restrictions,  monitor the impacts, and provide updates as changes are made. IWSD staff will work closely with  identified projects on a case-by-case basis to develop solutions that will maintain the integrity of  the City’s drinking water system while supporting continued construction and development projects. 

IWSD has well-established mitigation and response measures for situations like this and have  experienced professionals overseeing all aspects of the water system to ensure the continuity of  service and the safety of the system. Staff will continue to provide updates as more information  becomes available.  

If you have any questions, we have assigned a Councillor Liaison function for this response.  Please do not hesitate to contact Carol Hall, Incident Command Administrative Chief at  Carol.Hall@ottawa.ca or (613) 857-3549. 

Tammy Rose 

General Manager 

Infrastructure and Water Services  

 

For You:

Oh Those Golden Toilets, Oh Those …

Province Must Step In To Save City From Itself

City’s Fiscal Mess Will End Poorly: THE VOTER

The Sound And Fury Of Bulldog Live Chat

 

Bookmark The Bulldog, click here





5 Responses

  1. Donny Brooke says:

    Well, there’s a novel approach to “maintaining resiliency”.

    Other municipalities curate maps of their watermains and define ‘no-dig zones’ BEFORE excavations start.

    Apparently here, “out of an abundance of caution” they do the risk assessments after a watermain is wrecked.

    Keep up the inadequate work!

  2. David says:

    “abundance of caution.” Def: a very large quantity of something. e.g. “the tropical island boasts an abundance of wildlife.” Surely “appropriate” or “necessary” or standard” would fit the bill – unless what they are saying is there is a redundancy of caution – twice what is needed perhaps? Maybe three times – it being “abundant” – like tropical birds.

  3. The Voter says:

    Perhaps it’s taken a week to figure out how to spin this. The good people at Happy Town News may have had difficulty massaging why the MTO was excavating so near a watermain that it presented a risk to City infrastructure.

    I must say I’m greatly relieved to hear that they have “experienced professionals” overseeing the water system. We wouldn’t want somebody who didn’t know what they were doing, now would we! It does rather beg the question of how this kind of thing happens in the first place under the eagle eyes of such impeccably-qualified staff members. You need to be careful when you brag about staff competency when you’re explaining something that shouldn’t have happened.

    I know that if I want to dig in my backyard, I have to check with the City and the utility companies to ensure there is nothing under the surface that has to be avoided. Does MTO not also have this requirement? It’s not mentioned in the memo but who will be responsible for paying for this? We shouldn’t be covering MTO’s mistakes.

    I suppose we should be relieved that it was a watermain they hit and not a Hydro line.

  4. sisco farraro says:

    I read these memos from general managers and upper managerment at city hall and can’t help but wonder if they’re being paid to write them so they will have to be read multiple times in order for the reader to understand the point, or if point form data is provided to an AI writer (eg, ChatGPT) with instructions to “use polite language and make me seem intelligent”. Councilors don’t have time to read this .

  5. Ron Benn says:

    The completion of the pedestrian bridge linking Queensway Terrace North to Whitehaven (near Woodroffe HS) over the LRT tracks leading out of/into Lincoln Field station was delayed for at least a year. Why? Because the construction crews identified a previously not disclosed element of underground infrastructure, as they were getting ready to complete the access point to the already built bridge.

    Perhaps the reason that the Hwy 417 sound barrier crews struck water was because the city failed to provide accurate infrastructure locations, AGAIN.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *