Cyclists, Motorists … Give Peace A Chance
“I think it’s a culture war that they’re trying to create because it’s not going to help drivers, Congestion will remain the same, if not get worse because you’re just adding more and more cars in there instead of having alternatives like transit, like walking, like biking, like scootering.”
Capital Councillor Shawn Menard
Come on. Culture war?
We all know people who drive cars and others who bike. And they seem to be drinking white wine and devouring canapes in the Glebe … sometimes shockingly together … and yet war has not broken out. No gun-play at all. Most people are transportation-blind when it comes to receptions and the like. That’s good. Amazingly some people both drive and cycle and yet appear not to have required counselling.
Please councillor, give peace a chance. No North and South. No royalists and citoyens.
What Ottawa really needs is less factionalism on the transportation topic and fair-minded people designing our road and cycling maps in the safest and most efficient way possible.
Cyclists tell us that they fear being hit by a vehicle. Well they should be scared. Cycling on roadways, bike lanes on the side of the road or not, is dangerous. Most reasonable people would agree with that … motorists and cyclists.
The city is very proud of its bike lanes on Laurier Avenue. Yet I have found no parent who would want their children pedalling on those lanes. They’re too dangerous. Car and bikes don’t mix well and occasionally this results in tragedy … the fault of the driver or cyclist or both.
We need some thoughtful biking infrastructure that will keep cyclists safe. And that might not necessarily be on roads.
The first priority for bike lanes or paths is safety. If they are not safe, they should not be built. And many of our bike lanes and roads are not safe. Neither are they making cyclists nor motorists happy. Worst of all, they are not making Ontario Premier Doug Ford happy. And so the bull is in the transportation china shop. Ford wants to curb bike lanes. The worst possible outcome.
Somehow we must separate cyclists and motorists. The current system is not safe. Perhaps we build designated bike paths or we close Lisgar Avenue to motor traffic and make it bike only. Maybe we take the dangerous bike lanes off Laurier Avenue. Maybe we designate Spencer Street in the old west end as a bike-only route. These are not answers but suggestions. A long-shot maybe, but perhaps a start.
And rationally, we build bike paths rather than bike lanes where possible. Bike lanes are a cheap, dangerous way to keep the bike lobby on a slow boil and drivers steaming.
Ottawa and other municipalities have handled bike paths so badly that Ontario Government must step in. That’s ridiculous. We’ve seen what provincial intervention into the development world has wrought. The destruction of the fragile human infrastructure of neighbourhoods. And in Ottawa Queen’s Park wouldn’t know Blackburn Hamlet if it were flopped on Yonge Street.
Now bikes. Does Ford’s government know how traffic moves in Ottawa other than not at all? Does it know what works and what doesn’t work in Ottawa. The nation’s capital is so foreign to Ford that he had to appoint an Ontario ambassador to the nation’s capital.
The reason municipalities were created was avoid the problems that Ford is building now. The province doesn’t have the time, personnel, patience or ability to run Ottawa’s development and transportation. But then, neither does the City of Ottawa.
But nature abhors a vacuum and the vacuum in Ottawa leadership is profound. So the province moved in to fill the void.
Now we have the worst of both worlds … a province that doesn’t know what is do with Ottawa and a municipality that doesn’t know what to do with Ottawa.
Ottawa has botched transit, transportation, development and cycling. Now we have a province involved that might botch it all that much more.
Do a good job and you get praise. Do a bad job and you get Doug Ford. The mind wobbles.
Maybe if the City of Ottawa was better at what it did (such as handling cycling well), maybe the province wouldn’t be meddling in the mess.
So bring in the cultural war, councillor, to make it worse.
Ken Gray
Where are John and Yoko on the cycling issue?
For You:
Feds Could Shed Thousands Of Ottawa Jobs: STANKOVIC
Confed Line Should Have Been Diesel: THE VOTER
Name The No-Train Campaign: TOP 10 LIST
Bookmark The Bulldog, click here
Hyperbole is the strong suit for too many of those who populate council chamber. Culture wars. Heart pounding and palms sweating. Going ballistic. These phrases are tossed around willy nilly by councillors to draw attention to themselves. To demonstrate to their followers that they care.
What is missing from what passes for our leadership group are solutions that might just possibly work to the benefit of more than the self interest group that is being pandered to.
Ken. First off, I would have been shocked if you had not included a video of John Lennon and Yoko Ono with this piece (peace?). I have an interesting story about the Laurier bike lane. Shortly after it was opened my wife and I were walking westward on the north side of Laurier Avenue and saw a young man (university aged) pedaling his bicycle eastward on the south side of the street within the boundaries of the new bike lane. He was not watching where he was going, rather he was typing on his cell phone with both hands. And, he was not wearing a helmet. You can lead a horse to water but you it seems there’s no way to make it smart.
Ken, well I have to say I agree with the good councillor. When Doug Ford gets involved it’s not necessarily much about Ottawa. He has a whole Province to win and how better than through stoking a culture war? It won’t do much for him in Ottawa but his bread is not buttered here.
But I also agree with you Ken (except for the councillor-bashing part) because we really do not have safe cycling to help take cars off the road. If you look to Europe there are many places where whole families feel safe on bikes. We’ve been approaching that verrrry slowly but, until we get there, there won’t be a big change.
Maybe Catherine McKenny’s crew can get us there next election?
Jake
Good article
I commuted by car for 20 years and by bike for the last wonderful 20 years. a lot to unpack in the Ford changes.
Jake:
There is no “councillor bashing” in that post.
Criticism is not bashing.
You should be much more careful with your use of words.
cheers
kgray
Jake, Ken merely repeated the words used by Shawn Menard. Ken did not put those words in Menard’s mouth. Menard chose those words himself. Menard decided to start his remarks with ‘culture war’. He chose to use provocative words to ensure that he got the media’s attention. To draw attention to both himself and the issue at hand. It was his decision to select words that would provoke a response. And Ken responded. Are you saying that Menard should not be held to account for his choice of words?
Thank you, Ron.
I believe what Jake did was Bulldog bashing.
Sometimes that’s very popular.
cheers
kgray
I agreed with Ford and I agree with Menard. I agreed with McKenny.
Bikes have their use and their place and motor vehicles have theirs.
Separation is the key to success.
Keep things safe by developing separate infrastructure so that everyone can transport themselves with confidence.
In Ottawa we had the chance to elect a mayor who understood the need for cycling infrastructure. We got Suttcliffe instead. People voted for the kind of city they wanted and that put cyclists into the back seat and cars in the driver’s seat for the following four years.
But there will be another chance, and the worm may turn.
Thanks, Ken & Ron, for the correction. You are quite right.
Could you deal with the ideas in my post now?
Thanks,
Jake
Yes, Ken, Bulldog bashing is popular but then you have to deal with the ‘dog gnawing on your leg.
Jake