It’s Our City Government: MULVIHILL

 

mulvihill.small .logo

 



Serious public consultation sessions were de regueur when Bob Chiarelli was mayor of Ottawa. No more.

The provincially mandated 2001 amalgamation of cities and towns in and around Ottawa was a massive undertaking. Part of the amalgamation was the compilation of committees of council with members being councillors and the mayor. Advisory and ad hoc committees were then formed with membership consisting of community volunteers spending countless hours donating their time, knowledge and experience.

Public participation sessions were carefully organized offered both insight and opinion whether for committee responsibilities, naming of city-owned infrastructure or the multitude of corporate undertakings to eventually be coordinated into what would eventually become formal City of Ottawa bylaws and procedures.




The decline of public engagement began under former Mayor Jim Watson. Standing committees were restructured and advisory committees all but disappeared. Public participation became redundant. There is now little input from residents  at Ottawa City Hall. There is too much secrecy and after-the-moment communication to the general public.

Perhaps the time has come to bring back those public participation sessions to help lend credibility to the decisions made by councillors and Mayor Mark Sutcliffe.

Donna Mulvihill is a community activist and former hospital coordinator

 

For You:

Council, Lo Denied Access To Sprung Structure Info

Fleury Out As Cornwall Municipal CAO

Hill Backs Police, Better Sidewalks

 

Bookmark The Bulldog, click here


2 Responses

  1. sisco farraro says:

    I remember when Jim Watson was running for mayor at the end of Larry O’Brien’s first (and only) term in office. Jim, the Golden Boy returning from provincial politics, noted that he was going to spend more time listening to what local people/local groups had to say. My fondest memory of this promise was the fiasco that surrounded the new contract the city was working on concerning curbside pickup of solid waste. At that time garbage was being picked up weekly and there was a movement afoot to have it picked up every two weeks. A group from city hall attended one of our community association meetings to discuss the new plan, field questions, and listen to suggestions. Many people in attendance were concerned about the change and offered suggestions. As the meeting progressed, city representatives started looking at their watches more frequently. Then suddenly one of the representatives thanked all in attendance and noted that the decision to move forward had already been made. Although the group from city hall had listened to what was said by the attendees, they weren’t reacting in an appropriate manner (taking notes, etc.). So, why were attendees wasting their time consulting with these people when the decision to move forward as planned had already been made? There are four components to effective communication – meeting, speaking, listening/hearing, discussing. City hall should send its staff to courses so they can be more effective at steps three and four. And begin respecting peoples’ personal time.

  2. Jake Morrison says:

    Donna,
    I have been studying up on public engagement in Ottawa and have looked back to documents that are available from 2001 and onward.
    I can certainly support your conclusion and much of what you’ve said from those documents.
    The City is currently conducting a review of the currently in-force “2013 Public Engagement Strategy” (the result of the Watson restructuring). I put in ten pages of observations and recommendations.

    But you speak as though you were there. Could we get together to talk? I’d love to hear your perspective.

    Thanks,
    Jake

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *