Sprung Structures Don’t Work: QUOTABLE

quotable1

 

“The type of structure proposed is not appropriate for housing people in Barrhaven or anywhere, even on a temporary basis.”

Barrhaven East Councillor William Lo on sprung structures



 

Isn’t it interesting what people call things when the real name conjures up bad images.

You know, like tent.




And that’s what a spring structure is … a glorified tent.

For years, your agent played tennis in a sports bubble. It was a serviceable way to play tennis (though hitting lobs was a bit of a challenge) but you wouldn’t want to live there. And that the dressing rooms were in the main building meant a cold dash to and from the bubble before and after play. Nothing like shorts in January.

With the sprung-structure tents, one wonders if all the facilities necessary for life can be put there or is there a cold dash to … who-knows-what.

Another thing that happens in sports bubbles is that snow and bubble heating cause snow to fall from the roof to the bottom of the ‘walls.’ Freezing and thawing results in the ice and snow to turn it into a frozen wall as the winter unfolds. God help the person who runs into it fetching a shot. Reinforced concrete has more give. And in the sprung structure, how does that work for draughts?

As well, don’t forget that during big snow storms, periodically the air-supported bubble would collapse. A quick fix gets the bubble back up but it takes a long time to re-heat it. And sometimes, the forced-air to support the bubble creates a gap at the bottom so the elements can enter … like rain. If you’ve ever played tennis in a bubble with a red-clay surface, it performs like mud, Fortunately this crack is sealed by the ice wall over time.

Bubbles are not ideal places for tennis, less so for people attempting to live there. For tennis, bubbles are better than nothing and there’s no wind or rain (except when a hole develops in the roof … get out the Gorilla Glue).

Imagine coming from another land where, sometimes, people live in odd structures but nothing like a tent in winter. In fact, people coming to Canada often are very apprehensive about winter … like Canadians, come to think of it.

So a welcome in a tent might not be the right option. Furthermore, we’ve seen the stellar work of staff in other city projects such as … wait for it, light rail … and you wonder: “What could go wrong with a city-staff-approved tent in winter?” City staff would probably have trouble raising a little tent beside Lac Black Fly in summer let alone a mighty sprung structure. Staff has as much experience in tents as it has in LRT.

Surely there are other options with, say, plumbing that might be a better option. But some bushy-tailed staffer decided sprung structures would be best. Unique, innovative, promotion-creating like light rail.

One wonders that if staff were really proud of ‘sprung structures’, why they didn’t call them what they really are … tents.

Ken Gray

 

For You:

Count The Homeless, Then What? PATTON

Asylum Seekers Are People: BENN

City Hall Flags To Be Lowered For Haydon

 

Bookmark The Bulldog, click here





4 Responses

  1. Ron Benn says:

    A climate change activist councillor might want to know how the city plans on heating these large, somewhat insulated tents. With electricity that Hydro Ottawa may or may not be able to supply (see e-Bus fiasco)? Or with natural gas?

  2. C from Kanata says:

    We spoke to our councillor Cathy Curry about this. Apparently they were considering Dunrobin but with an absence of transit, it was quickly put aside as an option. Our concerns were with safety. Particularly fire safety. Although there will be central areas for cooking, people will want space heaters which can cause fires. The tents would have to have a sprinkler system. The councillor was comfortable with these shelters as they would be nearly identical to those used by our hospitals during covid. There are significant differences in that those refugees would be able to come and go as they please and buy space heaters or food to cook in their area. There will also be disputes because some people will be playing the radio loudly when others are trying to sleep. And as they would be bringing their belongings and possibly have already stayed at a shelter, there is the strong possibility of bedbugs. If you google fires and shelters and refugees, you will note that a fire in a spring shelter is a fairly high risk.

  3. The Voter says:

    “Nearly identical” in concept or form perhaps. Not in how they will be used. It’s one thing to use them as isolation wards or back-up facilities but a totally different thing to use them as 24/7 housing for vulnerable people including children.

    Speaking of children, how many are they proposing to put in this facility? Will the neighbourhood schools be able to absorb the influx or will they spend their days in a portable and their nights in a tent?

    Is the nearby Walter Baker Centre going to be able to provide recreational and other programming for both the children and adults or is its only usefulness to appear on a list of community amenities offered up as supporting information to the proposal? I understand from people in the community that many programs there are full and so not available for the people that are already in the Centre’s catchment area. How many staff there speak languages other than English and French?

  4. Been There says:

    I’m not in favour of a sprung structure for housing people in any part of the city, but I find the politics at play in Ottawa interesting. Councillors Hill and Lo are against them, probably because Barrhaven was shortlisted with two locations being highlighted. Now through Hill’s newsletter the citizens of Barrhaven as well as Mayor Sutcliffe are being lobbied to exclude the locations from the list. To add even more strength to their cause, the Barrhaven councillors have persuaded the provincial MPP for Barrhaven, Lisa McLeod, to come out of hiding and lend a hand.Her contribution was to recently announce that one of the Barrhaven sprung locations was to be the site of a remote critical care unit for the Queensway Carlelton Hospital . This initiative of hers may have been true many years ago, but it is hardly relevant today and hopefully council can ignore the theatrics and come to a reasonable decision .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *