Why We Are Right: City Of Ottawa





 

The release below is a piece of propaganda … pure and simple … on sprung structures.

These are not your your questions. These are question posed to the city to itself to justify why the city is right (in their eyes) on the sprung structure refugee question and they’re not changing their minds despite community protests.




The public is asking for a better idea but staff’s response is to say: “This is why we are right.” And we’re not changing our minds. If only the public understood the issue better (through this propaganda and their betters at city hall), they would agree that city staff is correct through answering staff’s own questions. Because how could staff be wrong given the success of light rail and Lansdowne? And how could the smartest community of Canada’s major cities be right? The public is so uninformed.

Why do we employ people at Happy Town News (city media relations) to pump out this stuff. HTN should be informing us, not running interference for blundering politicians and staff at taxpayer expense. A waste of our money.

Much of the public does understand the issue and doesn’t need this story to change their minds.

Here’s a hint to HTN. This is Journalism Theory 101. The media has no power to change people’s minds. People rarely … very rarely … change their minds and see the world through their own biases thus adapting events to their mindset. The media’s only real power is to decide the issues to be discussed, not to change people’s minds. People’s biases are set in stone and people adapt issues to fit their own biases.



Thus the HTN document is a waste of time and money.

This is a release from the City of Ottawa:

Newcomer Reception Centres: Your questions answered Part 1

A new centre to support refugees, which is comprised of asylum seekers and migrants, is planned to be built at the Nepean Sportsplex by the end of next year. This is the first building of its type to be established in our city, and it has raised a lot of questions from the community about its purpose.

A second building has been proposed in Kanata, but it is contingent on whether there is need for additional capacity and whether funding is provided to the City.

We understand that newcomer reception centres are a new concept and bring uncertainty, raising resident questions and concern. Earlier this month, we invited residents to submit their feedback to us through Engage Ottawa.

We continue to listen carefully and respond to your questions and feedback. This article is the first of a series over the next few weeks. We take a look at some of the top comments that have been sent in so far – to provide clarity and a better understanding of how these centres support asylum seekers and migrants and how they positively impact our housing and homelessness initiatives and programs.

1. Will you be funding the construction of the reception centres through municipal tax dollars?

Establishing the reception centres is a response to irregular migration, which is a federal issue. No municipal tax dollars will be used to fund the construction of the centres.

We have been in discussions with Immigration, Refugee and Citizenship Canada over the past year for federal funding to create a sustainable newcomer welcome and reception system in Ottawa.

A formal request for commitment of funding for the Newcomer Reception System has been submitted. The funding request will be updated as our plans are finalized.

2. Why did you not consider using existing infrastructure instead of building these new centres?

A thorough and extensive review of existing and available structures was conducted over the last year before settling on the current model. Many options were considered during a third-party expert review.

The tensile membrane structures were chosen due to quick building timelines, costs, and adaptability. These structures are not tents. They are like any other building with a heating and cooling system, kitchen amenities and plumbing.

Reception centres are an important first step in the resettlement process for asylum seekers and migrants. They are not the only solution that we are pursuing to provide temporary shelter for asylum seekers and migrants.

They are part of a broader strategy that includes using brick and mortar buildings as transitional housing. This includes the National Capital Region YMCA and a former nunnery at 1754 St. Joseph Boulevard.

3. Once centres are no longer needed, will you be turning them into homeless shelters?

There are no plans to convert newcomer reception centres into homeless shelters or emergency overflow centres. The structures are being purpose built in response to significant pressure on the existing shelter system that currently sees asylum seekers and migrants make up 60 per cent of clients.

Any future considerations on adapting the structures for alternate uses would involve community discussion and engagement.

If you want more information on the newcomer reception centre project, you can visit our Engage Ottawa page. You can also check out our previous story where we answer some of the most frequently asked questions.

Newcomer Reception Centres: What You Need to Know

We encourage everyone to follow our series of articles and continue to ask questions at Engage Ottawa.

Together, we can continue the tradition of being a welcoming city.

 

For You:

Service Key To Best OC Transpo: BENN

City Hall Einsteins Make Unprecedented Transit Blunder

Full O-Train To Close Dec. 1 For Testing

Administrator Would Make Final City Decisions

 

Bookmark The Bulldog, click here





3 Responses

  1. The Voter says:

    Interesting wording in the first question – no municipal dollars will be used for construction. What about staffing and other operational expenses such as food, heat and hydro, furniture, bus tickets, clothes and the list goes on?

  2. sisco farraro says:

    Another issue comes to mind. Allowing newcomers into Canada, placing them in temporary housing in Kanata and Orleans with a transit system that doesn’t effectively serve the city, let alone the periphery, and expecting them to integrate into Canadian lifestyles? I’m sure we can do more to make these people feel unwelcome.

  3. Jake Morrison says:

    Ken, you say: “These are not your questions. These are questions posed to the city to itself to justify why the city is right (in their eyes) on the sprung structure refugee question and they’re not changing their minds despite community protests.”
    What are our questions?
    thanks,
    Jake

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *