Kavanagh Will Vote Against Lansdowne
This from X:
It would be interesting to hear other councillors voting intentions on Lansdowne.
—
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
LANSDOWNE: A Critical Look At City’s Position
Watch Let’s Talk Lansdowne Video Right Here
City Issues Release Of Pure Pro-Lansdowne Propaganda
Get Real, City Council. Get Real: BENN
Don’t miss our regular features
Everything Ottawa Full Local Bulldog Canadian
Opinion Comments Breaking News Auto
Ontario World Get Cheap Gas Big Money
Pop Gossip Your Home Relax … Tech
Bulldog Weather Full Local Sports
TV/Movies Travel
Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6
As a resident of her district I’m very pleased to hear this. By the way, isn’t there a rule that whenever you mention X you must follow with an explanation that it used to be called Twitter?
While any councillor who actually cares about the City’s finances should actually vote against Lansdowne 2, it is disturbing to think that Councillors actually think that the City has $419 million to spend just sitting in reserves and this money can just be spent on something else. Lansdowne was going to be primarily funded by debt which means the debt servicing can only come from increased future taxes, money diverted from other spending , future tax base growth or a combination thereof. For a councillor to think that by not spending on Lansdowne that suddenly $419 million is freed up to spend on other things is wrong. The City can choose to borrow $419 for other capital projects, but there is not just a pot of tax money just lying around ready to be spent. The other night at the Lansdowne presentation, someone suggested that if we didn’t spend on Lansdowne, each councillor would have an additional $20 million to spend in their ward. Equally as wrong.