Bulldog Lansdowne Meeting Continues Here Live Friday

The Bulldog is now carrying the live city feed on this post of the joint finance and planning committee meeting Friday.

The meeting will debate and vote on the Lansdowne 2.0 proposal.

The feed is below:

Joint Finance and Corporate Services and Planning and Housing Committee

Feel free to comment on the committee meeting as it unfolds in the usual comment area below.

 —


RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

The Basic Unanswered Questions From Lansdowne (1)

The Basic Unanswered Questions From Lansdowne (2)

The Basic Unanswered Questions From Lansdowne (3)

Answer These Lansdowne Questions Councillor Carr

 

 

Don’t miss our regular features
Everything Ottawa      Full Local     Bulldog Canadian
Opinion    Comments    Breaking News    Auto
Ontario   World    Get Cheap Gas   Big Money
Pop Gossip   Your Home    Relax …   Tech
Bulldog Weather    Full Local Sports
TV/Movies   Travel
Page 2   Page 3   Page 4   Page 5   Page 6

 

Other features:    Full Bulldog Index    Return to Bulldog Home

6 Responses

  1. Frank Zarboni says:

    It’ s insane to think that a 3rd tower will be for affordable housing in any way. Who does OSEG think they are.?

  2. Ron Benn says:

    Frank, material changes to a plan that are announced at the last minute are indicative of desperation. Desperation by OSEG. Desperation by planning staff. Desperation by certain the members of council. Desperation by all those who can see and smell the smoke. For those who fear that Lansdowne 2.0 will go down in flames.

  3. Ken Gray says:

    Ron:

    You are absolutely right … but I don’t see how staff and OSEG make the connection between another tower and getting this thing passed.

    If anything, another tower alienates the Glehe if not more people. You’re right about what they’re trying to do … no question … but the proponents radar is way off on the effect on council and the public.

    cheers

    kgray

  4. Bruce says:

    Typical of how the `city`conducts these `public`presentations. First those opposed then those who are in support of the mayors stance? OSEG and those who are in favour seemed to say that the reason for what is now known as RENEGOTIATION of Landsdowne 1, waterfall drip, which has some years left to run is not sufficiently profitable to OSEG. Hence OSEG seems to be saying “if you do not like our newest offering then we will take our football, hockey team and newfound basketball team and go home!”
    My reply might be Goodbye!, even though I watch and attend football and hockey games. I did listen to the Bulldog online coverage but not all of it. Thanks Ken

  5. Bruce says:

    Simple question to residents and council.What would you prefer? A city with a nice playground for the developers to make money off, and failing infrastructure, transit and increasing homelessness combined with added huge debt OR a city known for fiscal prudence and a clean, safe environment where it is easy to get around and more people housed and cared for?

  6. Bruce says:

    Frank of EKOS A sharp pencil can develop the result one wants, especially when one is PAID to do the research!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Paid Content

Home   Full Bulldog Index