Lansdowne 2.0 Has Serious Heritage Impacts: REPORT
This is a report to the city built heritage committee slated for Nov. 6:
Report (EN) – Lansdowne 2.0 Heritage Considerations (REV)
—
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
LANSDOWNE: Councillor Carr Needs A Thicker Skin
The Basic Unanswered Questions From Lansdowne (1)
The Basic Unanswered Questions From Lansdowne (2)
Ottawa Bus Service Gets Cuts, Major Overhaul
Don’t miss our regular features
Everything Ottawa Full Local Bulldog Canadian
Opinion Comments Breaking News Auto
Ontario World Get Cheap Gas Big Money
Pop Gossip Your Home Relax … Tech
Bulldog Weather Full Local Sports
TV/Movies Travel
Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
– The Bulldog – News Feed Enter 
This report is submitted “for information.” Why? Are there no Council decisions needed? It seems that there are. What is the legal and political effect of a motion to “receive this report as information”? Is there an implicit activity approval and implicit / explicit direction to staff to proceed as suggested in the report? Or, in my view, what would be more proper, does staff collectively and singly – see this as ONLY a status report and sit on the suggestions until actual direction is given?